Berta Passola vs Laura Cilekova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 11 Jul at 03:15 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
B. Passola vs L. Cilekova

ESP
1
Win
Played
0
Win

SVK
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Passola 1 - 0 Cilekova
They have played 2 sets in total, with Berta Passola winning 2 and Laura Cilekova winning 0. The last match between Berta Passola and Laura Cilekova was at the W15 Kursumlijska Banja, 11-07-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Draw getting the victory 7-6(4) 7-6(3).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Passola | 1 |
| Cilekova | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) W15 Kursumlijska Banja(07-11-25)
B. Passola vs L. Cilekova H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 66.67% (34-17) | Career Total W/L | 44.44% (48-60) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
B. Passola vs L. Cilekova Match Preview:
- Cilekova has shown slightly better performance on their second serve, winning 34.82% of points compared to Passola's 32.73% over the last six months.
- Both players have strong return games, but Passola edges out with 54.72% win rate on opponent's second serves compared to Cilekova's 51.54%. On first serve returns, Passola leads again with 38.46% over Cilekova's 35.03%.
- Why is breakpoint performance crucial? Cilekova saves 35.88% of breakpoints, while Passola is stronger at 46.15%, a vital stat for managing pressure moments.
- In terms of win/loss record over the past year, Passola has a superior rate, winning 60% of matches versus Cilekova's 43.33%.
- Which surfaces do they excel on? Cilekova performs best on Hard with a 58% win rate, whereas Passola excels on Clay with a 70% win rate.
- Passola's matches generally feature opponents with a higher average rank (379.8) suggesting tougher competition than Cilekova's average opponent rank of 495.63.
- In deciding sets, Passola is notably better, winning 75% compared to Cilekova's 56% win rate in the last year.
- The breakpoint conversion is close, but Passola has a slight edge, converting 48.57% of chances, while Cilekova converts 45.68%.
- Match level impacts predictions: Cilekova often competes in $10K level tournaments with a 48% win rate, whereas Passola wins 62.5% in similar-level competitions.
Editorial Prediction (July 11, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Cilekova and Passola presents an intriguing battle with both players showing impressive skill sets in their statistics.
Passola's recent return game statistics are stronger, and they outperform in breakpoint scenarios, crucial for high-pressure phases of the game.
While Cilekova has a modest advantage serving-wise on the second serve, Passola's superior record in deciding sets underlines their mental fortitude.
Considering the overall win rate and the level of competition Passola has faced, they demonstrate greater efficiency and effectiveness on the court.
Given these insights, Passola is positioned as the likely winner of this forthcoming tennis match.
Berta Passola vs Laura Cilekova Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
B. Passola vs L. Cilekova H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 14 | Games Won | 12 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 15 |
| 2:57:21 | Average Match Time | 2:57:21 |
| 67% (79/118) | 1st Serve % | 59% (64/108) |
| 52% (41/79) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (36/64) |
| 49% (19/39) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (19/44) |
| 40% (6/15) | Break Pts Won % | 27% (6/22) |
| 49% (53/108) | Return Points Win % | 49% (58/118) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
B. Passola Recent Matches Played
L. Cilekova Recent Matches Played

B. Passola vs L. Cilekova Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66.67% (34/17) | YTD Win/Loss | 44.44% (48/60) |
| 64.04% (73/41) | Sets Win/Loss | 44.92% (106/130) |
| 56.53% (593/456) | Games Win/Loss | 48.05% (1008/1090) |
| 68.57% (24/11) | Hard Win/Loss | 57.14% (28/21) |
| 62.50% (10/6) | Clay Win/Loss | 36.17% (17/30) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 25.00% (3/9) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 33 | Aces Total | 64 |
| 0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.4 |
| 168 | Total Double Faults | 406 |
| 1:16:6 | Average Match Time | 1:16:10 |
| 346.59 | Average Opponent Rank | 382.99 |
| 67% (1670/2500) | 1st Serve % | 65% (3533/5419) |
| 61% (1018/1670) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (1977/3533) |
| 45% (375/829) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (764/1886) |
| 49% (167/341) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (350/693) |
| 48% (1207/2516) | Return Points Win % | 47% (2551/5405) |
| 50.00% (5/5) | Challenger W/L | 23.08% (6/20) |
| 70.73% (29/12) | Futures W/L | 51.22% (42/40) |
| 67% (34/51) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 46% (48/104) |
| 75% (6/8) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (8/15) |
| 58% (7/12) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (14/24) |
| 91% (32/29) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (45/36) |
| 9% (32/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (45/8) |
| 26% (19/5) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (63/12) |